Salon des Refusés:
Holy Crap (Cut It Out)/Say Hello to Mr.
Painting/Spy Paintings 1-3/Thumb Up-Down/Chosen One/Mesjus/Art
Dump (Monster Artist Rising)/Concept Whore/How Did the Show Go?/Underwater
Sculpture/Critic/Suicide Painter/Happy Amateur/Monument for Praising Oil
(rejected)/The House I Will Buy/Strange Sculpture in the Woods/How I Got the
Show/Making Friends with the Shadow/Migrating Birds/X-Ray of Foot
2007-8
The series of paintings Salon des Refusés is made up of pictures that in different ways takes
on problematic tied to the role of the artist, the artwork and its context.
Originally the ‘Salons des Refusés’ were organised as
a reaction to the traditionalist selection of the Paris salons. These exhibitions were made out
of all sorts of rejected art, including works that later have been canonised
into art history.


Almost all of the canvas is cut out in Holy
Crap (Cut It Out) (mixed media, 50 x 50 cm) leaving the canvas stretcher laid bare. The piece goes from picture to object, from
product to remainder. Art might in an extremely critical light be seen as a
form of sanctifying scrap. And that which at first is depreciated can later
turn to gold.

The medium of painting is said to be
unavailable. To overcome this obstacle, the piece Say Hello to Mr. Painting
(mixed media, 150 x 70 cm)
gives you an opportunity to practically shake hands with the painting.

Spy Paintings 1-3 (oil on perforated
canvas, 3 á 50 x 40 cm) are portraits that
allow for spying through peeping-holes-as-eyes, like in the old crime fiction
movies. The portrayed is here a mystical dark figure. The element of voyeurism
in art gazing is inversed: Who is looking at whom?

The painting Thumb Up-Down (oil on
canvas, 70 x 90 cm)
lets you choose if the thumb shall point upwards or downwards. Critical art viewing
means you should always take a positive or negative stance towards artworks.
You are either in favour of it or you are against – in this case you have the
opportunity to change your mind.

Chosen One (mixed media, 90 x 70 cm) is a painting and
collage produced by simple means, as a naive icon. A smiling character raises
his hand in a gesture of greeting. Is he chosen or is the onlooker chosen by
him? The idea of a ‘chosen one’ is often accompanied by a belief in the sacred
purity of naivety. Probably this is a self portrait as one is always the chosen
one by one self.

Mesjus (oil on canvas, 100 x 110 cm) follows this theme,
but here the artist is portrayed as a messiah figure. However the picture’s frame
is crocked as a sign of unsound foundations.

Underwater Sculpture (oil on canvas, 80
x 60 cm)
pays homage to Michael Sailstorfer who has made a
series of sculptures which are to be dumped into the sea. The picture shows the
remains of a mafia style execution (feet into cement).

In Art Dump (Monster Artist Rising) (oil
on canvas, 80 x 100 cm)
a monster is ravaging a junkyard of art: The artist is growing out of a
depthless gap of art historical remains. A sign reads “no commercial value”, indicating
that the artist must break out of the commercially exploitable to be able to
create art, thereby turning himself into a useless dreg.

”Concept Store” is a term used by large
labels to front their exclusive shops. In this painting we see a shed situated
in a wasteland area. On a large sign above the entrance the words “concept
store” is replaced by “Concept Whore” (oil on canvas, 80 x 100 cm). If we take the term
whore in its popular sense as referring to an exploited and servile person, we are
here talking about conceptual servility. Are we not lending ourselves to
obeying an unknown power of definition by accepting ideas and modes of
behaviour as given?

“How Did the Show Go?” (oil on canvas, 80 x 60 cm) is asked by a painting depicting a head
on a stake. In this case it looks like the public has been provoked and has
taken it out on the artist. The artist runs an emotional risk by making his
work public, worse the more heartfelt it is meant.

In Critic (oil on canvas, 80 x 60 cm) we see a portrayed
figure with big ears and sunglasses on a grey face. He might not see that well,
but his hearing seems all the better. This might indicate a bigger interest in
the artworks connections than in the work as such.

Hinting both to the hard living and
forceful nihilistic approach associated with abstract expressionism in addition
to the desperate, spectacular and devastating action of suicide bombing,
Suicide Painter (oil on canvas, 60 x 80 cm) attempts to comment on the turmoil of
artistic practice. Entering into an undisclosed war of interests, the artists’
self-consciousness-combined-self-sacrifice can be seen as a soft version of the
messiah-syndrome death drive. Also taking into account the shared mission to
make ones voice heard in a seemingly deafening cacophony, the character of the
inspired artist and that of the crusading resistance-fighter bear some
resemblances.

Being a Happy Amateur (oil on canvas, 50
x 50 cm)
– painting away without thoughts or concern about the discourse or ones
art-historical heritage – could be a tempting position was it not for its
independence being an illusion. The “free” position of the naïve is at large a
repetition of that which others have prepared the ground for. Being so, it is
still hard to imagine vigorous art was it not for a large portion of the
stubborn self-evidence of the amateur. Simultaneously we cannot escape a large
portion of unconscious dependence, making us all in a sense
always happy amateurs.

Oil has become a scapegoat for all sorts
of environmental pollution and socio-political problems. Our condemnation of
oil works as an indulgence for the fact that the whole industrialised world is
relying on it. Another perhaps less self denying stand would be to pay tribute
to the substance, and Monument for Praising Oil (rejected) (oil on canvas, 60 x
80 cm)
depicts a proposed monument for serving such a purpose, which has been
rejected. A symbolic parallel might be seen in the oil painting’s fall from
grace.

The House I Will Buy (oil on canvas, 46
x 36 cm)
is a simple picture of an artists dream: Success that will allow him to afford
a home.

Strange Sculpture in the Woods (oil on
canvas, 36 x 46 cm):
That which looked like a strange sculpture in the woods turned out to be a
hideous beast, or not? Sometimes it can be hard to tell what the artist has
attempted to paint!

What kind of coarse play allows for the
artist to exhibit? How I Got the Show
(oil on canvas, 46 x 36 cm)
illustrates a suspicious looking nude scene. The rumours of return service in
the art world flourish, it might seem that artists are the ones who least of
all expect a genuine interest in their work. There are always other reasons,
which is to some extent true, no doubt.

Within psychology the shadow serves as a
symbol of the unknown within you. In Making Friends with the Shadow (oil on
canvas, 50 x 50 cm)
the artist and his shadow are getting along, although it might seem that the
shadow is the more enthusiastic of the two.

The other part of the cut-in-half
picture Half Price (from the series Comments?) was made into Migrating Birds
(oil on canvas, 10 x 20 cm).
That which could have been a landscape now only has room for the upper half,
this showing the sky and a flock of birds.

How personal can a story be and still
serve as background for an artwork? And what does the public’s knowledge of the
underlying story matter to the reading of the work? X-Ray of Foot (oil on
canvas, 90 x 30 cm)
is made from the artist’s remembrance of a broken leg, but all information that
could shed a light on the specificity of that injury is inaccessible. Should
the story be thrown overboard as the artwork is materialised? In that case we
can reiterate Wittgenstein: “And now, forget all of the above”.
index